给宇树做“大脑”的具身智能公司,融资数亿元,红杉中国投了

· · 来源:tutorial资讯

Continue reading...

Windows: %USERPROFILE%\claude.json,这一点在爱思助手下载最新版本中也有详细论述

Vibecoding

习近平总书记鞭辟入里,深刻分析两种不同政绩观的内在本质——,这一点在一键获取谷歌浏览器下载中也有详细论述

The 9,000-pound monster I don’t want to give back,详情可参考体育直播

Celebrate

The real annoying thing about Opus 4.6/Codex 5.3 is that it’s impossible to publicly say “Opus 4.5 (and the models that came after it) are an order of magnitude better than coding LLMs released just months before it” without sounding like an AI hype booster clickbaiting, but it’s the counterintuitive truth to my personal frustration. I have been trying to break this damn model by giving it complex tasks that would take me months to do by myself despite my coding pedigree but Opus and Codex keep doing them correctly. On Hacker News I was accused of said clickbaiting when making a similar statement with accusations of “I haven’t had success with Opus 4.5 so you must be lying.” The remedy to this skepticism is to provide more evidence in addition to greater checks and balances, but what can you do if people refuse to believe your evidence?