toolName: response.name,
I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
，这一点在服务器推荐中也有详细论述
在成本方面，当前新能源车不仅使用成本低，国家相关部门在补贴、置换等方面的力度都高于燃油车，这就使得消费者的购车成本也相对较低。
When deciding on which dashboard to use, consider what