I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
南方周末：我们来聊舒伯特吧。这张专辑的发行时机很有意思，你刚刚获得肖赛冠军，就推出了这张舒伯特即兴曲专辑，当然它肯定是在肖赛之前就已经完成的。虽然你也有肖邦的唱片发行，但那张毕竟是比赛现场录音。这张专辑第一首《c小调即兴曲》开头强奏的那个音，让人感受到一种很重的力量。这套即兴曲作品对你来说意味着什么？
，详情可参考heLLoword翻译官方下载
You must confirm your public display name before commenting
ВсеГосэкономикаБизнесРынкиКапиталСоциальная сфераАвтоНедвижимостьГородская средаКлимат и экологияДеловой климат
Sign again using the "Alternative verification" method. In the verification details, mention that you previously signed anonymously and would like to switch to a named signature. We'll update your entry and make sure you're not double-counted.